Comparing Buzzy(R) and Pikluc(R) for Pain Relief in Pediatric Intramuscular Injections: A Randomized Equivalence Trial
Source: Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses
Authors: Jefferson Wildes da Silva Moura, Mari Takashima, Sabrina de Souza, Thiago Lopes Silva, Aline de Souza Bitencourt, Kaili da Silva Medeiros, Henrik Hjelmgren, Luciano Marques Dos Santos, Amanda Ullman, Patrícia Kuerten Rocha, Publication Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:00:00 -0400
Pain Manag Nurs. 2026 Apr 21:S1524-9042(26)00126-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2026.03.016. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare three devices: BuzzyⓇ 15 seconds (intervention 1), PiklucⓇ (intervention 2) and BuzzyⓇ 30 seconds (control group) for non-pharmacological, non-invasive pain relief in children during intramuscular injections.
METHOD: This was a three-arm, non-masked, parallel-group, randomized equivalence clinical trial in children aged 1-11 years (stratified by: 1-3 and 4-11 years) at two Brazilian Pediatric Emergency Units. The primary outcome is pain, measured by observer-reported pain using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale for children aged 1-3 years and by self-reported pain using the Faces Pain Scale – Revised for children aged 4-11 years. The secondary outcome is pain (parent- and observer-reported) and distress. The study is registered in the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry under the number RBR-57m3wnw.
RESULTS: Of 170 participants, 54 were allocated intervention 1, 60 intervention 2, 56 control group. For ages 1-3 years, all comparisons were equivalent: PiklucⓇ vs. BuzzyⓇ 30 seconds (mean score difference [MSD] -0.457; 95% CI: -1.191, 0.277), BuzzyⓇ 15 seconds vs. PiklucⓇ (MSD 0.296; 95% CI: -0.438, 1.030), and BuzzyⓇ 15 seconds vs. BuzzyⓇ 30 seconds (MSD -0.161; 95% CI: -0.912, 0.590). For ages 4-11 years, the primary outcome (self-reported pain) did not show equivalence for any comparison, while observer-reported assessments (secondary outcomes) suggested equivalence for PiklucⓇ vs. BuzzyⓇ 30 seconds and for BuzzyⓇ 15 seconds vs. BuzzyⓇ 30 seconds.
CONCLUSIONS: In children aged 1-3 years, equivalent pain relief was shown across all devices during intramuscular injections. For children aged 4-11 years, there were inconsistencies between observer, parent and self-reported assessments.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: For children aged 1-3 years, both PiklucⓇ and BuzzyⓇ devices can be used during intramuscular injections, with PiklucⓇ offering immediate application and BuzzyⓇ 15 seconds showing similar effects to 30 seconds application.
PMID:42020278 | DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2026.03.016
Pubmed ID: pubmed:42020278
Identifiers: pmid:42020278, doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2026.03.016,