Comparative Safety of Common Immunosuppressant Therapies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Target Trial Emulation Study

Source: Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)
Authors: Alí Duarte-García, Marlon J Sandino-Bermúdez, Mariana González-Treviño, Cynthia S Crowson, Rozalina G McCoy, Yihong Deng, Publication Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 06:00:00 -0400

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2026 Sep 17. doi: 10.1002/art.70343. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Compare infection-related hospitalization risk among patients with non-renal SLE initiating commonly used immunosuppressants.

METHODS: We emulated a target trial using Optum Labs Data Warehouse claims to compare the risk of infection-related hospitalization among patients initiating azathioprine, belimumab, methotrexate, or mycophenolic acid analogues (MPAA) between March 2011 and September 2023. We excluded patients with prior lupus nephritis, solid-organ or bone marrow transplantation, or rituximab/cyclophosphamide exposure. The primary outcome was time to first infection-related hospitalization, using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting to account for baseline covariates and fitted marginal structural Cox models incorporating time-varying monthly glucocorticoid dose during follow-up.

RESULTS: Among 6,168 patients, 24-month cumulative incidence of infection-related hospitalization was 10% (95%CI 8-12) for azathioprine, 8% (95%CI 5-10) for belimumab, 10% (95%CI 8-11) for methotrexate, and 13% (95%CI 10-15) for MPAA. In ITT analyses, MPAA had higher risk than belimumab (HR 1.55; 95%CI 1.07-2.25) and methotrexate (HR 1.32; 95%CI 1.04-1.68). In PP analyses, azathioprine (HR 2.04; 95%CI 1.01-4.16) and MPAA (HR 2.27; 95%CI 1.11-4.62) had higher risk compared with belimumab. After accounting for time-varying monthly glucocorticoid dose, between-treatment differences were no longer significant.

CONCLUSIONS: Initial differences in the infection-related hospitalization risk were attenuated after accounting for time-varying glucocorticoid exposure. These findings highlight glucocorticoid exposure as an important factor associated with serious infection risk, while recognizing that post-baseline glucocorticoid use may reflect both evolving disease activity and a pathway through which therapies influence infection risk.

PMID:42750573 | DOI:10.1002/art.70343

Pubmed ID: pubmed:42750573
Identifiers: pmid:42750573, doi:10.1002/art.70343,

Paper chosen by Lanfranco Pellesi

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.